Life is Strange - Episode 1: Chrysalis Review

Life is Strange is an episodic adventure game in the vein of Telltale's recent output, focusing on Max Caulfield, a high school senior at a prestigious school in rural Oregon as she navigates the often messy relationships and life searching that typically pervade this time in a young adults life. Life is Strange purports to tell a high school coming of age story with a sci-fi twist, as Max soon discovers after witnessing the terrifying accidental shooting of her former best friend, that she can rewind time. What's interesting is that the developers, Dontnod Entertainment, use this ability not simply as a gameplay mechanic and puzzle solving device but as a way for Max to become more introspective. The game exudes a shockingly accurate depiction of an indie film, between the characterizations, the music, and the general tone of the writing, which unfortunately feels out of touch at times, Life is Strange clearly takes inspiration from films such as Juno and The Perks of Being a Wallflower to name a couple.

Life is Strange follows the formula most, if not all, adventure games use these days, focused on choices and consequences over traditional puzzle solving. Every response and action you take will have repercussions, some within that same episode and others over the entire season. What makes Life is Strange unique in this regard is the ability to rewind and alter your choices or simply retry interactions for better results. The game smartly allows you to abuse this mechanic quite a bit, allowing for experimentation and exploration of both the games mechanics and the stories characters. It's fun to redo a conversation after learning a key piece of information and having that interaction go more smoothly and exactly the way you wanted. Which is another reason why this mechanic is more than just that; the setting and tone of the story allow for this very 'game-y' mechanic to integrate with the story. Max reacts the way anyone would upon discovering this unbelievably useful ability. Think about how amazing it would have been to have this ability when you were in high school, thankfully the writers thought the same thing and sufficiently explore both the advantages and consequences to being able to literally redo any moment. 

This is the first episode of five so story wise there it's a lot of set up and only minor characterizations, there are a few characters who are clearly important but are severely underdeveloped as well as a darker underlying mystery that is just barely teased. The story and characters are, thus far, well crafted if slightly cliched but filled with potential, the darker themes and more serious aspects of the story can be jarring at first but as the full story slowly reveals itself it's clear this is a world grounded in reality and that our time with Max and her best friend Chloe is going to be far more serious than the initial introduction seems to imply. Overall Life is Strange seems like an exciting new adventure game from a fairly untested developer; Dontnod's only other game is the retrospectively ironically titled Remember Me. The wholly original setting and tone as well as the promise of a highly introspective character driven story is a highly appealing prospect to me and I can't wait for episode two.

(4 out of 5)

Quick & Dirty Reviews

Big Hero 6 (4 out of 5)

For being yet another predictable super hero origin story, Big Hero 6 manages to pack enough heart and inventive action to make it one of the best animated films of the year. The film celebrates science like I've never seen in a children's movie, our heroes are self described nerds, and proud of that fact. They are inventors, engineers and chemists. The film also explores oft-ignored qualities like creativity and passion for learning. For these facts alone Big Hero 6 shoots way up my recommendations list. But thankfully the film is also unequivocally great; performances from the entire cast are fantastic and characters animate beautifully. Even the robot Baymax who never displays a single facial expression still manages to pull off the highly emotional finale, a credit to the fantastic performances and strong writing. This is a children's films that you can be happy to see and take children to go see, it treats it's audience with respect and never panders. No matter your age Big Hero 6 is an exciting super hero film that will inspire you and melt your heart.

Whiplash (5 out of 5)

For a movie based in the music world this film has little do with that particular artistic expression. Instead Whiplash is a phenomenal character study that delves deep into the psyche of two characters desperate to fill holes in their lives. A young aspiring jazz musician who wants nothing more than to be remembered and achieve recognition for his presumed talent. And a ruthless perennially unimpressed jazz teacher who despises anything less than utter perfection yearns to assist the birth of musical greatness. He pushes his students past the breaking point not dissimilar to the way the army breaks down recruits to build them back up as soldiers. An apt comparison as the first half of the film feels very much like Full Metal Jacket in music school. J,K. Simmons is an absolute animal in this film, and I mean that with all due respect, a quick glance from him with eyes filled with fury and it'll make you wince. His mere presence exudes intimidation, but his brutal treatment of his students earns every ounce of it. Miles Teller's performance starts off meek and slowly falls away to reveal a cutthroat ambition and drive that finds little happiness outside of achieving his teachers unreasonable expectations. The films gloriously intense climax is both blood soaked and triumphant, encapsulating both characters and their tragic psyches perfectly.

Kingsman: The Secret Service (3 out of 5)

A spy film that harkens back to the more campy era of Bond films, Kingsman: The Secret Service brings back the outlandish and fun spy genre. What's great about Kingsman is that it pokes fun of old school spy films while simultaneously crafting a fairly decent spy romp of it's own. Similar to Edgar Wright's Cornetto trilogy, Matthew Vaughn clearly loves the campier spy films of yesteryear and thus Kingsman's take on the genre feels more like a loving homage than cutting satire. The films plot is predictable and forgettable and you'll likely not add the film to your collection but it's a well executed action film. Colin Firth is enjoyably out of character as a badass gentleman spy mentoring a former colleagues wayward son. The action is kinetic, filled with inventive and infectiously paced scenes that'll have you tapping your foot along to the action and editing like a catchy song. Kingsman is an enjoyable two hours at the theater even if it isn't going to set the world on fire.

The Imitation Game (4 out of 5)

A wonderfully executed biopic of one of the most brilliant minds of the 20th century and a criminally unthanked contributor to the Allies successful defeat of  the Nazi's in World War II, Alan Turing. The Imitation Game is brilliantly acted, with Benedict Cumberbatch giving the most riveting performance of his career yet. Unfortunately this film feels very, Hollywoodized, the facts are true to life and the performances aren't melodramatic but everyone is a bit too clever, every scene a bit too important. I very much dislike films that come off as trying to hard to impress critics, to me it's distractingly obvious. But despite that fairly significant complaint this is still a great film, it's just trying too hard to be a prestigious one. I'm happy Alan Turing has finally received such a fine portrayal of his monumental contribution to the war efforts while also never diminishing what made the man other than his accomplishments. The Imitation Game is a great biopic led by a greater performance and it'll likely win big during award season, just as it was designed to do. 

Selma (3 out of 5)

Selma marks the very first time the story of Martin Luther King Jr.'s fight for civil rights has been told on film. Focusing around the intense three month period in Alabama, wherein peaceful protests were meet with viscous assaults which would later become known as Bloody Sunday as well as the eventual successful march from Selma to the capitol in Montgomery. While an unbelievable fact that King's monumental impact have never been committed to celluloid it may be because it was destined to have David Oyelowo in the lead role. Oyelowo gives a rousing performance as the man behind the myth, as the depiction of MLK in this film is of a man both fed up and tired. His rousing speeches are punctuated by quite moments where doubt, fear, regret and exhaustion eat away at his conscience as he struggles with how to lead his devote followers who he is putting in potential harms way. Oyelowo makes this movie, the story is fairly one sided and too many character come across as villains in what purports itself to be a biopic comes across outlandish at points. Selma contains a great performance of an astounding man but is surrounded by amateur storytelling that falls prey to often to lazy cliches.

Foxcatcher (5 out of 5)

Foxcatcher stars two unrecognizable stars, Steve Carell and Channing Tatum who not only disappear via prosthetics but through unnerving portrayals of two very unstable men. The direction feels very detached, Bennett Miller is more interested in letting scenes go on a couple of seconds longer then they normally would, which allows emotions to set in and the messy awkwardness to simmer. There is a rule to writing, "show, don't tell" and this film exemplifies that technique, the films most memorable or tense moments are completely silent but the actors performances portray more than any dialogue ever could. This isn't a plot heavy film, the characters and their personal journeys are the focus here and it makes these true events all the more tragic. What transpired at the Foxcatcher estate is surreal, at least as it's depicted here, with the things that fueled these men; greed, vanity, jealousy, loneliness, earning for respect, overcoming inadequacies, it's not surprise things ended such as they did. Foxcatcher is immensely unnerving and not entertaining in the least, it crawled deep under my skin and I'm counting the days till it crawls back out. Supported by two career defining performances by Carell and Tatum and an unsettling detached direction that unnerves in every silent moment, Foxcatcher is one of the best films of the year.

Boyhood (2 out of 5)

Boyhood is a technical achievement to be sure but the timescale it was filmed on proved to unwieldy for this director as the aimless story and odd pacing drag the film to a crawl. Boyhood is a nearly three hour home movie, with no core story to speak of the film relies on periodic segments in the life of one family, covering 14 real world years the characters age and grow on screen in the one truly astounding aspect of this movie. Otherwise this is a film that has nothing new to say about the adolescent experience and haphazardly leaps through time causing an odd sense of reliving key moments instead of the forward passage of time. The performances from the adults in the film are believably grounded and the most compelling part of the movie by far, it's a shame then that they are not the focus. I don't have many good things to say about Boyhood as I found it immensely boring and lacking in any substance or true vision. The filmmaker seemed content on just rolling the cameras on whatever new dramatic family moment he could think of next with years passing by in the interim.

More soon ... 

Nostalgia to the Test: The Wire

I watched The Wire about 4 years ago when HBO GO first launched. I came to series after it had become television legend, many critics heralding it as the greatest television drama of all time. When I sat down to watch the series for the first time it seemingly surpassed those lofty expectations. A testament to the shows quality and groundbreaking innovations that to this day have not entirely been surpassed. So here we are, 12 years after the show first premiered and 4 years since my first viewing, I've decided to revisit the series, on the one hand because HBO has remastered the entire series with direction and approval from the original creators. The changes aren't limited to higher resolution, the series which was original broadcast in standard definition with a 4:3 ratio can now be seen in high definition widescreen (16:9). Many scenes have also been color corrected to fix shots or entire scenes that were previously too dark or simply hued in a displeasing way. In this feature I'll not only discuss the pros and cons of the HD remaster of this beloved series but I will also reassess my thoughts on a show that till this day I've considered a masterclass of television and nigh untouchable.

Lets start with the technical analysis. This HD remaster has altered the show significantly, not only is every shot in widescreen displaying things that were previously just out of frame but I would argue that the change to widescreen has also altered the shows storytelling capabilities. First off, the show was shot in widescreen but broadcast in standard definition 4:3, this means those behind this remaster don't have to zoom in to get rid of the black bars that would appear on the sides of the frame on a widescreen display. This is a huge benefit, plenty of people have forcefully implemented widescreen, as you can see on the right, and the zoomed in effect is terrible, actors are cropped out and the entire feel becomes very claustrophobic. The Wire was shot in widescreen so this is thankfully not a problem, the original negatives contain the entire shot, with a little touch up it looks great on a modern widescreen display. The one problem the show runs into is that anything that was just outside the original 4:3 framing is now in the shot, this can create a slew of odd shots that would never have made it past the eye of even a woefully incompetent cinematographer. Most of these are minor issues, a distracting door or a car's side view mirror now in the frame, those issues are easy to overlook. The problem comes when this new widescreen format interferes with the storytelling. Everything in film making is there to serve the story including framing, a shot that once saw bystanders extend past the frame felt like the scene was bustling now the widescreen shows their were less people than the viewer had imagined. This remastering is a marked improvement overall but there are some pretty significant issues that people may not notice upon passive inspection but subconsciously they are missing out on the original story telling intent of a scene. Check out some examples below.

The pole creates a false frame in widescreen

The original shot uses the pole as a frame

This confrontation is messy and close up

In the remaster the shot breaths removing tension

A typical over the shoulder shot

Distracting pink couch and empty space on the left

None of these issues ruin the show and overall the widescreen presentation improves on more scenes than it diminishes. The higher resolution and color correction are nothing but positive results of this remaster. Scenes that were too washed out are toned down, scenes that were too dark are lightened up and various odd hues, particularly yellows, are removed completely for a cleaner look that you could mistaken was shot on modern cameras only yesterday. But does the show hold up.

I'm happy to say, it does. The Wire is rightfully considered one of the greatest television shows in history. Every character is a fascinating and multilayered person that you'll like in one moment and despise the next. Major character are gay but they are not defined by their sexuality, a problem even modern shows have. The way seasons explore different aspects of crime in the city of Baltimore through the eyes of the law breakers and enforcers has still never been done before. Season 1 follows the drug trade, season 2 city port smuggling, season 3 politics and so forth. This allows the show to change up the focus and explore different types of crime following the same characters, this can sometimes be a problem though when an episode has 2 minutes of a character in jail just to remind you he is there. The show can feel bloated as we check in with characters from 2 seasons ago, it feels tangential and takes focus away from the main plot and character arcs of the current season. Having said that every character is interesting and the upside of seeing the heroin addict with a penchant for helping the cops, Bubbles or the merciless gangster with a strong moral code, Omar Little is greater than never seeing those characters again.

The Wire manages to shake up enough of the core conceit season to season that the show feels fresh each time. I'm happy to say The Wire holds up brilliantly, with the exception of some pacing issues due to overstuffed episodes, I still believe The Wire is one of the best television dramas in history and absolutely on of the most influential.

Thoughts On: The Marvel Cinematic Universe

It's been 7 years since Iron Man came out and since then Marvel has grown a brand like no other company I've ever seen, besides Disney with whom, fittingly, they are now apart of. 7 years and we have had 10 films, 2 TV shows and many more of both still to come. They've also pioneered the idea of a shared universe where all the stories they tell exist and interweave, similar to the way the comics have operated for the better part of 50 years. It makes sense, Marvel began in the movie business the way any brand does, as licensed content. Deals were made, contracts were signed and we got the X-Men, Spider-Man and Fantastic Four films. But they were separate franchises, Spider-Man wasn't going to swing by Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters and more than that these characters were being interrupted by movie studios more interested in producing a film that will make them millions than honoring the characters. Thus Marvel Studios was born, this wasn't a hired team of film studio executives, these were the same men and women who had been running the original company. The artists and writers who had been defining these characters and this universe in thousands of various comic books. Who better to bring the characters to the silver screen than those who know them better than anyone.

Marvel began this whole venture by setting up solo films, where major characters could have their origin and develop on their own, Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and so forth. This all led to a culmination in Avengers where each of these heroes, who were already holding their own franchises joined forces to combat a powerful foe. Genius. Then each of the characters went back to their own solo franchises, but the universe felt bigger. Minor characters from the different films were showing up in other franchises, Coulson being a staple of a few of the films. Marvel then decided to add a new medium to this interconnected universe, television. Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. followed a mysteriously resurrected Coulson leading a team around the periphery of the Marvel universe dealing with lower level threats. That shows started off as a me-too kind of thing, pathetically chasing after the success of the Marvel films throwing in an eye-rolling number of references in the hopes of proving their importance.

It wasn't until the last 6 episodes of the first season where Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. really came into its own. This marked improvement of the show was able to happen because of Marvels interconnected universe, the events of Captain America: The Winter Soldier saw S.H.I.E.L.D. dismantled as the evil organization HYDRA was revealed to have deeply infiltrated the organization. So how did a show named after the organization react, perfectly. S.H.I.E.L.D. is destroyed HYDRA agents began slithering out from beneath their covers and things went bad for our heroes very quickly. The stakes were raised, characters stepped up and developed in interesting ways. Tying into the The Winter Soldier arguably saved the show, from mediocrity and possible cancellation. Season 2 while only in its first half has taken the momentum from the previous seasons finale and completely altered the dynamic on the show. And as of the last episode before the winter hiatus, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. has gone from chasing after its more successful older siblings to paving the way for future films and franchises. A revelation in the final moments of episode 10 has set-up drastic changes to the entire Marvel Universe. The exiting part is that the show will be paving the way, in this new exciting frontier.

The massive success Marvel has found in each new venture spurred them to take bigger risks on relatively unknown properties. Guardians of the Galaxy, which proved to be a runaway success has assured Marvel that people view them as a sort of seal of quality, and will go wherever they lead. And excitingly for this Marvel fan, and the millions of others out there, that means delving into some of the more popularly unknown corners of the Marvel comics. Soon to be seen in theaters are Ant-Man (who can shrink to the size of an ant, control said insects and increase in strength while small), Doctor Strange (who defends the world from demons and other mystical creatures from alternate dimensions using magical abilities), Black Panther (the prince of Wakanda, a highly advanced nation in Africa, who defends his city with powers gifted to him by the Wakandan Panther God), Captain Marvel (an Air-Force pilot who through a freak accident is physiologically fused with a member of the Kree alien race bestowing her with immense powers), and The Inhuamns (an entire society of people who were experimented on early in Earths history and isolated, all of whom are gifted with thousands of various abilities). If it wasn't clear through those, possibly insane sounding, descriptions Marvel is confident in themselves and if history is any indications movie goers will have nothing to fear. Marvel has a plan, they teased a character at the end of The Avengers named Thanos, he made a small reappearance in Guardians of the Galaxy and almost everything that has happened in the Marvel Universe can be traced back to him and what he is trying to achieve. When Avengers 3 rolls around the aforementioned films will have all come out, the existing franchises will have all had 3 films. And the sum total of 19 films and 6 TV series will conclude with a two part showdown with this unfathomably powerful foe.

But Marvel is also making headway on the newest content front, streaming distribution. Marvel has tapped Netflix to premier 4 brand new characters each with their own 13 episode season, culminating in a 5th show where the separate heroes team up. Sound familiar, Marvel is hoping what worked for their film ventures will work for them on Netflix. First up, premiering on April 10th of 2015 is Daredevil. After that Jessica Jones, followed by Luke Cage and Iron Fist; culminating in The Defenders. Marvel knows these heroes wouldn't be served well with a 2 hour film, these heroes are better explored in a 13 hour binge marathon. These heroes wouldn't compete with the Avengers these are street level heroes, none of them can fly or control lightning but they can help out the everyday people Iron Man and Thor regularly fly over. Jessica Jones in particular is interesting because she is a former super hero who has retired and opened a private detective agency. Like I mentioned these characters fight for the little guy, the old lady at the end of the street, the kids playing basketball at the park, the guy at the hot guy stand. All four of these series have the potential to explore the universe further and build what is quickly becoming the quintessential dream of every major company in the entertainment industry.

Warner Bros. who own DC have tied together their CW shows Arrow and The Flash. Soon they hope do the same in with the DC Universe in theaters with Man of Steel being the first but Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice opening up that world very quickly, potentially too quickly. 20th Century Fox has retroactively created a shared universe with their X-Men films. Sony tried and failed miserably to turn a single character, Spider-Man, into an entire shared universe. Even Universal is creating a shared universe with their classic monsters, Dracula, Frankenstein, The Mummy, etc. their is no reasonable reason for these films to exist in a shared universe but it shows how desperate studios are to capture the magic Marvel seems to be bursting with.

Another genius of Marvel is that each of their films explores a different genre, Captain America was a period war film, The Winter Soldier was a political thriller, Guardians of the Galaxy was a space opera, the upcoming Ant-Man is a heist film. This postpones, but does not eliminate, the potential for super hero movie fatigue and their are going to be a lot of super hero films in the coming years. Marvel themselves are ramping up production from 2 films a year to 3. That may not seem like a lot but with sequels to the X-Men films, a rebooted Fantastic Four, and DCs slate of 10 films in 5 years. The whole thing has the potential to snap under the weight of so much money stretched thin via saturation.

As it stands Marvel seems to making all the right moves, and they at least seemingly appear to genuinely care about the quality of their output and less about how much it can fatten their wallets. This means their is an emphasis on creativity and risky ventures. Billions of dollars later and Marvel Studios is still made up of the same people who were telling stories with these characters in comic books. They are still very much in love the each and every one of them and thankfully they seem to want to do right but them all. A few years ago a Doctor Strange film wouldn't have ever received the green light, even their latest ABC series Agent Carter is risky, depressingly, for being a female led period drama. But Marvels clout means no one questions their choices and everyone turns up to see what they've crafted. This is an enviable position which I showed others are salivating to achieve but the difference is that their competitors are cynically chasing the financial success and aren't as concerned with the care and craft that goes into bringing these characters to life. I tip my hat to Marvel, as a comic book fan, as fan of good television, and good film-making they are a continual beacon of hope that creative and quality works can still exist in an increasingly committee approved, fiscally motivated industry. Thanks Marvel. Keep it up, were counting on you.